RSS Feed

March, 2016

  1. Don’t Deceive – parents “CANNOT” fix schools

    March 19, 2016 by Tunya

    NOTHING We Can Do To Fix Schools

    Michael Zwaagstra’s Book — What’s Wrong With Our Schools: and How We Can Fix Them — is a total FLOP. It’s a 6-year-old book for Canadians. Nothing has happened in 6 years to improve education ! I might like a traditional Zwaagstra-type school but most schools today are of the progressive, Alfie Kohn type. There are at least a dozen such books in the US, all with the instructions of what to do to fix failing schools. NOTHING WORKS.

    Until we have “A to Z schools” — or call them Alfie (for Kohn) and Zwaagstra (for Michael) schools — that is, a variety of choices, we will continue to rant and rail and things will get progressively (yes, “progressively”) worse.

    See this article about university students: Pass, Fail by Srigley in April’16 Walrus: https://thewalrus.ca/author/ron-srigley/

    “Remove your professor hat for a moment and students will speak frankly. They will tell you that they don’t read because they don’t have to. They can get an A without opening a book.” Srigley writes about the wasteland that many universities have become.

    I like Arizona Senator McCain’s proposed legislation to give every American First Nations Student an Education Savings Account equivalent to 90% of the Bureau for Indian Education’s funding to buy a private school education. I believe in public funds for education, but not in the monopoly hands of public or bureau schools.

    Only in this manner will we get the “A to Z” schools that will serve the education needs of students instead of the pet schemes of monopolists and faddists.

    [to FB – SQE]


  2. Weak Government Allows Teacher Union Power

    March 19, 2016 by Tunya

    Governing Side Allows The Gouging

    The ultimate goal is LABOR PEACE. Thus, the governing bodies, whether Central government or school boards, capitulate to heavy-handed bargaining ploys. The bargaining ploys are international tricks-of-the trade. Whipsawing is one of the strategies. If one teacher union in X county achieves a benefit through collective bargaining, others will soon use that fact as a catch-up issue.

    Since these sessions are not transparent and held behind closed doors, rent-seeking is also a ploy. This insider trading leads to sweetheart deals.

    Add on the fact that union dues are 100% tax deductible and we can easily see that a teacher union confers huge costs on the public purse.

    Peace is extracted because the government side fears public disruption.

    The best books on this topic of economic costs and lost opportunities for education reform for our children are by Myron Lieberman and while the information applies to American systems the international scope is relevant to our Canadian scenes. Google — Released-Time Subsidies — and you will get 7 instructive pages on this issue highlighted by the G&M article above.

    [ Posted in G&M article http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/tdsb-osstf-fight-over-subsidies-for-union-staff-member-salaries/article29283670/ ]


  3. Should the public subsidize teacher unions?

    March 19, 2016 by Tunya

    Public Subsidizes Teacher Unions – Longstanding & TOO LONG

    Who knows when the exact moment happened — when the first teacher union contract achieved the twist to get the taxpayer help fund their muscle to squeeze the taxpayer dry. (Why does this image keep popping up of feeding the pet python that eventually chokes you to death?)

    Apparently getting school boards to subsidize teacher unions has a long history and embedded in many world locations. Please read the following from this book —

    Understanding The Teacher Union Contract, Myron Lieberman, 2000, pg 105

    “Released-Time Subsidies

    In many school districts, school boards subsidize union operations in the following ways:

    • Granting union members released time and/or leaves of absence with pay (often including fringe benefits) in order to conduct union business
    • Performing the payroll deduction of union dues, agency fees, and PAC contributions at no cost to the union
    • Giving the union free use of district facilities and services, including the use of space for union meetings, use of the district mail system, and the right to address faculty meetings
    • Giving union employees advancement on the teacher salary schedule for time spent working for the union
    • Payment by the school district of contributions of union officers and staff
    • Reimbursing union members for travel expenses for union events

    Most school board members are not aware of the magnitude of these subsidies. In school district budgets, the subsidies are never grouped together under the heading “Subsidies to the Union.”” [By Googling —subsidies to teacher unions — you should see this reference — Understanding the teacher union contract: a Citizen’s Handbook. You should be able to read about 7 pages of details.

    Dr. Lieberman died in 2013 but amongst his most notable books about American education was — THE TEACHERS' UNIONS: How the NEA and the AFT Sabotage Reform and Hold Students, Parents, Teachers and Taxpayers Hostage to Bureaucracy, 1997. From an obituary we read: “He reserved particular ire for the nation's more than 14,000 local schools boards, writing in a 2007Education Week Commentary essay that such board members' private interests and lack of expertise in labor relations gave unions an advantage in collective bargaining.”

    Though the amount of money is small, this one item has stalled contract talks between TDSB and OSSTF. It obviously is a significant, high-stakes issue — not small bananas. It would be enlightening to know the debate about this issue and why it is so critical that taxpayers be seen to fatten the union’s bargaining powers.

     

    [ Posted as comment on SQE, 2016 03 20   http://www.societyforqualityeducation.org/index.php/blog/read/a-horse-that-never-dies ]


  4. Teacher unions and rent-seeking

    March 9, 2016 by Tunya

    Immorality Reaches Its Zenith With Teacher Unions

    There are three courts where injustice is judged: legal courts, courts of public opinion or the heavenly court of destiny — karma.

    The Bible (James 3:1) says: “Not many of you should presume to be teachers, my brothers, because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly.” If presumptuous teachers will be more harshly judged, won’t their protection agencies, the unions, be even more harshly dealt with?

    Look up — rent-seeking teacher unions — and you’ll find a whole category of economics showing how teacher unions and their “insider” dealings (rent-seeking) lead to: dominance; lowering school productivity; efficiency-reducing; compromising democracy; higher taxes; extortionary practices; funding left-wing political groups; opposing choice and alternative schools; etc.

    This is an international behavior of teacher unions. They learn from each other how to “game” their communities.

    Newspaper eye-openers may garner 1000s of comments of outrage to little effect. Which of the three courts will finally judge and stop this man-made human disaster, which harms children and society?

    [Posted on SQE    http://www.societyforqualityeducation.org/index.php/blog/read/sunday-at-the-movies-teachers-unions2  and Globe and Mail comments – Ontario teachers' union presses for $140 million strike fund http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/ontario-teachers-union-pushes-for-140-million-strike-fund/article29091123/ ]

    [Reply to a reader's comment:  Teachers “Teach” & Also Convey An Attitude Of Resentment 

    We have about 20 Teacher Training Facilities Across Canada. I bet all (or most) have this book on their reading lists (mandatory or optional) — Pedagogy of the Oppressed by Paulo Freire. 

    Again, as in an earlier post, I make the point that the education “profession” has strong international connections. If you Google this book’s title and “teacher training” you will note how prevalent is its use. Also used in UK, NZ and Australia teacher training. 

    Teacher unionism plays on the feelings of teachers as being an oppressed class. And, many teachers in their classrooms communicate that students should make “meaning” out of their lives and question dominant views. “Change the world” is a major theme. ]


  5. Amish in PEI – helping widen education choice in canada

    March 4, 2016 by Tunya

    Home Education — Lessons To Be Learned

    As a “movement” home education was “jump-started” by John Holt in the 70s.
    John Holt’s Conversion to Home Education https://gaither.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/john-holts-conversion-to-home-education/

    I’ve been involved from that time. But, I learned early on in my half-century of parent involvement to stay under the radar. WHY? Because the moment any breakthrough appears for the parent (CONSUMER) side the system (PRODUCER) side immediately goes into containment-mode. Parents as consumers are seen, and treated, as a hostile enemy. Producer-capture of the industry continues. To this day, the control is overwhelming. Parents have been nearly totally seduced and coerced into compliance and complicity into a one-size-fits-all monopoly model of schooling.

    Long story. With the link above you will see how I wrote about the movement for Canadian educators and about the predatory state and how Holt expressed fear of creeping fascism (see comments).

    Thus, when I saw how a government (in PEI) actually responded to parents’ interests in educating their children and removed a restrictive obstacle, I rejoiced. Please see form mandating a teacher advisor: http://www.hslda.ca/assets/images/member/provincial_pics_and_forms/PEI-Intent_to_Homeschool_Notice.pdf

    NOTE: That provision is now lifted not only for the Amish but also for any other parents undertaking home education. Please consider what such an advisor entails — 1) difficulty in obtaining such educator who is unfettered from union or other constraints; 2) an advisor whose mindset is undoubtedly influenced by 120 semester hours in a government teacher training program.

    Seeing that educators are even now raising the alarm that PEI’s responsiveness to its constituency is a sell-out to privatization simply illustrates how the producer side raises fears when it sees any leakage from its self-serving domain. Their radar has now sounded the alarm !

    BTW: That “Homeschooling in Canada” Report Paul Bennett references is worth reading. But without having to go into all 68 pages here are some choice “signals” that will be noted by those threatened by consumer voices.

    – “The four western provinces and Quebec have the most extensive, recent, and detailed provision for home schooling. British Columbia should be noted for its newer policy in Distributed Learning and Saskatchewan for its especially extensive proactive consideration of home schooling.” pg 32

    – “Although Prince Edward Island has updated its regulation, arguably it has done so because it is routine to do so, and not because of a proactive shift towards home schooling.” (Strange. This, 2015 Report seems unaware that proactive activity was involved on behalf of the Amish community intending to settle in PEI.) pg 32

    – In Saskatchewan, parents’ voices and communal action combined with a new ethos of responsiveness in the province and focus on student achievement have resulted in district boards offering increasing amounts for homeschooled students within their jurisdictions. Parents, for example, who register their children in the largest school board in the province are eligible to receive up to $1,000 per home-schooled student. pg 22

    A question was asked: Does the PEI concession to Amish education open the door for greater freedom of choice in education for others? YES, it does. The restrictive clause was not only removed but the discussion engendered has been educational and enlightening. We now know that that particular clause was designed as a deliberate disincentive to home educate. We know that proactive lobbying helps sway progress, as in PEI and Sask, for example. . And we know that there is such a thing as “a new ethos of responsiveness” in government (as in Sask). Let’s hope that this discussion launches more efforts to loosen the producer-side’s suffocating stranglehold on prevention of widening education choices in Canada.

    Thanks for bringing this matter forward, Paul There’s lessons to be learned if we pay attention.

    [published as a comment in SQE    http://www.societyforqualityeducation.org/index.php/blog/

     and Educhatter :   https://educhatter.wordpress.com/2016/03/01/school-choice-in-pei-will-the-amish-school-open-the-door/#comment-19666 ]